Peter Degen-Portnoy wrote: > Thanks, Steven, for the added perspective. > > What do folks consider a "high-volume" site? If I'm looking to handle 3 - 5 > million page views monthly, which I can do with a few production Rails > servers and a non-trivial production architecture (memcache, n-tier > architecture, etc.), do folks think Radiant will be up to the task? > Well, the ruby-lang site runs on Radiant.. wonder what configuration it uses.
That said, if your content doesn't change too rapidly, you can increase the cache timeout to a good large number.. my sites are not high volume - more like niche technology sites, so I wouldn't know for sure. Cheers, Mohit. 12/24/2009 | 9:47 PM. _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
