This is great stuff, thank you so very much, Mohit!

- Peter


> From: Mohit Sindhwani <t...@onghu.com>
> Organization: Viometrix | Onghu
> Reply-To: <t...@onghu.com>, <radiant@radiantcms.org>
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:00:45 +0800
> To: <radiant@radiantcms.org>
> Subject: Re: [Radiant] Stories of stability
> 
> Peter Degen-Portnoy wrote:
>> Fellow Railsians and Radiant peoples;
>> 
>> We are essentially performing a CMS bake off.
> We are going through a similar issue.  I love Radiant but we have had a
> few issues with trying to use it for a new site.  So, let me get this
> started...
> 
> [+]
> 1. Radiant is stable - I haven't had any issues on low volume sites that
> I operate.
> 2. I program in Rails/ Ruby, so extensibility is easy!
> 3. Radiant is a breeze to maintain.
> 4. You can do almost any thing that you might need.
> 
> [-]
> 1. Radiant templates - this is the most common problem I faced.  People
> always talk about how easy it is to get templates for something like
> Joomla.  I haven't used that yet, but there's this perception that it
> would be easier if we were using Joomla.
> 2. Setting up the site for getting in content takes some time - you need
> to install Radiant (that's the easy part) but integrating the extensions
> that you may need takes a while longer.  You need to make sure
> everything is OK.  Then you need to start on your templates.  In a
> sense, Radiant seems to give you too much freedom - you have to create
> your layouts, snippets and then your pages.  You have to "code" your
> navigation and so on.  If you want support for Flash videos, either you
> code in your HTML or you add an extension... and so on.  One of the
> problems that this creates is that it seems that a lot of extensions are
> needed and there's very little "in the box" - even something like
> attachment support has to be added on.
> 3. Some of the non-technical people don't seem to like Radius all that much.
> 4. Finally, no WYSIWIG out of box - I prefer that, but the non-technical
> users seem to prefer WYSIWIG (at least till they start to appreciate
> TexTile.
> 
> Overall, I would pick Radiant cos I think it's quite neat :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Mohit.
> 12/24/2009 | 2:58 AM.
> 
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to