Keith Brooks wrote:
> Why is it then
(-=A=- sticking his head on the chopping block- "for the boys")
The philosophy of "boy Leadership" is not completely desired
in our fellowship, or respected as a virtue. *I don't fault the
individuals or the institution... Because it is a un-seen opportunity
at developing the character of boys along side the other great
aims of Royal Rangers.
RR offer's excellent fellowship, and freedom for Dad's and sons
to share the joys of our times together, But cutting the "apron"
strings means more than the gender statement implying a break
with "Mom"....
It's my desire that the Leadership, embrace all the points of the Ranger
emblem with equal vigor.
-=A=-
> the upper echelon at the National Council would not listen
> or even consider any of the ideas presented by our elected Scout and
> Assistant Scout. Some people were even so rude that while they were
> speaking, they got up and left the room. Try doing this to Fred at a NTC or
> other training camp.
> Keith Brooks
_______
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm
http://rangernet.org Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
