The bit: ; Note "$ x 5 $ y 7" isn't right; that maps to ((x 5 (y 7))).
..should be better placed in a paragraph - I for one tend to skim over
source code in the SRFI.
--
The bit: Changing all of sweet-expressions, just to handle this particular case,
does not seem warranted.
...this doesn't seem to scan well. It seems to introduce an argument
to support a position (don't change all of sweet-expressions) but the
paragraph it's in doesn't look like it introduces the opposing
position.
--
You might want to juxtapose:
let
\\
x $ foo bar
use x
versus:
let <* x $ foo bar *>
use x
I suggest you use something similar to what you did in
readable.sourceforge.net: use a table so that both examples are
side-by-side.
I also suggest using the given example above rather than (let ((x 5))
(+ x x)), since it gives a better justification for using RESTARTBEGIN
/ RESTARTEND : We want to use "foo bar" not "foo(bar)" for stylistic
reasons (i.e. foo is a "command" whose return status we want to know,
not a "function" that just computes something).
--
This bit: begin <*
Looks wrong. Shouldn't that be: <* begin ??
Of course, it depends on what, exactly, is meant by <* *>. So maybe:
"begin . <*" ??
Sincerely,
AmkG
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery
and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts.
SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
