RB compiling to flash makes very little sense. Flash is ALREADY cross platform and has its own IDE. Why would anyone need to use a separate product ?. FLASH is designed very much to use a specific language - one geared towards multimedia.
I Think this is very much barking up the wrong tree. Maybt there is a case for flash hosting within RB, but porting to FLASH from RB would just be a waste of resource. If you want to write flash, use the Flash toolset. On 1/2/07 05:14, "Guyren Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Karl Holmes wrote: > >> i would like to produce some educational "film clips"( ie mini >> lessons). If these were to be used on web it would seem that Flash >> is the best solution. However I would prefer not to have to leave >> RealBasic behind and learn Flash. > > I consider being able to compile to Flash (ie choose a compiler > option and generate a flash version of your desktop application) the > most compelling possible major upgrade to REALbasic. > > RB is already unique in compiling for all major desktop platforms. If > it could also generate web applications, it would own the world. > > Regards, > > Guyren G Howe > Relevant Logic LLC > > guyren-at-relevantlogic.com ~ http://relevantlogic.com > > REALbasic, PHP, Ruby/Rails, Python programming > PostgreSQL, MySQL database design and consulting > Technical writing and training > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives of this list here: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
