Hey, I just found out the Sox swept the Rays who still have the best record in baseball.
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Salemi Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: "Papi's Fine" Or a log. Or perhaps stuck between the sofa cushions. Or at the bottom of the pocket of those jeans you wore the other day. Or ... On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote: So I guess I have been under a rock. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Salemi Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: "Papi's Fine" Yeah, that was a great quote. That's also what he calls his segment on EEI on Sunday mornigns with Bradford and that other guy. On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote: Last night my son and I were discussing the resurgence of Big Papi, and he mentioned the prophetic "laser show" quote that Dustin Pedroia made in the midst of David's slump. I had not heard of said quote, so he respectfully asked me if I had been living under a rock. If you haven't heard seen it, check out this clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPvMOVFshyI You gotta love Pedroia's confidence. Steve G. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Beaudoin, John Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:47 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Statistics says : "John and Steve are right. It's too early to know." Re: Papi, I love the fact that I was completely wrong, or at least it seems that way. I didn't think he'd ever get the bat around in time to hit a fastball out again. Glad I was a wrong. ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Thu May 27 07:50:50 2010 Subject: Re: Statistics says : "John and Steve are right. It's too early to know." Lowrie has been a huge disappointment. I was hoping for big things. On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote: Actually, as previously reported, I was unimpressed with this team as early as January. I have a strange habit of using my mind, reaching conclusions, offering opinions and, if wrong, saying so. Guess that makes me a weirdo. Things I'm wrong about... Buchholz is a monster. Honestly, I can't believe he was lumped in as part of the V-mart discussions. He's a 1a guy today.* Martinez is still an effective catcher, but we'll need to see the entire season. Varitek is an effective back up. Beckett is a worry. Papi isn't Papi, but he's not done. That's a good thing. *As an aside, I'd like personally thank the Minnesota Twins for not accepting the Red Sox offer for Johan Santan, a deal that reportedly would have included Lester. (It's laughable that there was debate as to whether Ellsbury should have been tossed in as well.) The Twins got very little in the trade. Three of the four players they secured from the Mets aren't even with the organization. One of the departed includes Carlos Gomez who was traded for decent SS JJ Hardy. The Sox deal reportedly include Lester, Coco Crisp, Jed Lowrie and Masterson. The last two aren't successful yet, but at least they can play in the majors. The Twins got shinola for their Ace. The Sox offer was much better. On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Beaudoin, John <[email protected]> wrote: Hilarious stuff. Glad I like to just watch the game. If I spent my time embroiled in past numbers, I might be inclined to think it was a rebuilding year as early as late April. Comebacks are great stories. Seasons without drama and without streaks and lead changes are boring. I like the Sox' chances ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Thu May 27 07:10:04 2010 Subject: Re: Statistics says : "John and Steve are right. It's too early to know." Dang! I screwed this up. I forgot to multiply by 1.96. Now the range is .140 which means .422-.703 real skill level for the team. Which is the same as saying we have no additional information. On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote: I think Larry has hit the nail on the head in this debate: "How good is this team?" I think that even John would admit that, even though it's May, and even though anything can happen, and even though you gotta play the games, that the season is over for Baltimore. How do we know that the season is over for Baltimore? Because Baltimore has a .319 winning percentage and we're sure that they are not really a .580 team on a bad streak. That brings us to the Sox. They are playing at a .563 pace (91 wins) . What are the odds that they are really a .586 team (95 wins) on a bad streak? Statistics can tell us this based on the season so far. It can give us the 95% confidence interval. So we can say with 95% confidence that the Sox are between two possible numbers of wins. Here's the equation: Confidence interval = 1.96 * sqrt(WP(1-WP)/#games played) So for the Sox we have: 1.96 * sqrt(.563 * .437 / 48) = .071 So that means that there is a 95% chance that the Sox real skill level is between two numbers .563 - .071 = .492 = 80 games .563 + .071 = .634 = 102 games And so the final result? It's still too early to say whether this team can make the playoffs. Ray On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Larry Rupp <[email protected]> wrote: Sweep or not - walking into Tampa no one (outside of maybe a few of us here) thought the Red Sox would take all 3 games. I think a statement has been made that indeed the Sox are a championship caliber club this season. Let's see where things fall by the All Star game however we have a lot of numbers to go in the season before a final decision will be made on the top 2 teams in the AL East. -Larry -- Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide" www.fpgasimulation.com <http://www.fpgasimulation.com/> -- Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide" www.fpgasimulation.com <http://www.fpgasimulation.com/> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. -- Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide" www.fpgasimulation.com <http://www.fpgasimulation.com/> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
