The Sox have too many question marks for them to consider a big splash like 
this. If they were only a hitter away from the WS, I'd
be bummed. I'm just happy that the Yankees didn't get him and his WS rings..... 
Oh, wait.....

Dan D
Central NJ USA




________________________________
 From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: Sox get Dempster
 

I'm not interested in blockbuster players anymore.  I think it's too many eggs 
in one basket.




On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Matt & Olga McSorley <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Nick Cafardo writes that the Sox should have chased Josh Hamilton. That, of 
course, means they did the right thing passing him up.
>
>http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2012/12/sox_should_have.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Matt & Olga McSorley <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 7:41 PM
>
>Subject: Re: Sox get Dempster
> 
>
>
>He meets present Sox criteria:
>
>1. Warm body.
>2. Short-term deal.
>3. No draft-pick compensation.
>
>I'm not sold on the plan, but we can't say they don't have one.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Steve Ouellette <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 4:20 PM
>Subject: Re: Sox get Dempster
> 
>
>Meh.
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>From EEI art
>>
>>
>>One major league source suggested that the Sox should -- and likely do  -- 
>>have “modest expectations” for the veteran, describing him as the best option 
>>available on a relatively short-term deal that permits the team to minimize 
>>risk, rather than a true impact starter who can transform a rotation.
>>
>>
>>“He’ll carve up weaker lineups and will be a positive clubhouse guy,” said 
>>the source. “[But it's] hard to expect much against the deeper lineups and I 
>>don’t think [the Sox] do.”
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Sounds about right. I guess $13m doesn't get you what it once did. 
>>
>>
>>I guess he's making $2m less than Beckett
>>
>>
>>                       ERA    WHIP       SO/9
>>Becket            4.65    1.327       7
>>Demps           3.85    1.319        8.7
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>Not crazy about the Dempster signing. Basically  career NL pitcher who was 
>>rocked last year in the AL (except when
>>>he pitched against us.............).
>>>
>>>Angels be crazy.
>>>
>>>Dan D
>>>Central NJ USA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From: Tom Salemi <[email protected]>
>>>To: [email protected] 
>>>Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:28 PM
>>>Subject: Sox get Dempster
>>> 
>>>
>>>two years at $26.5 million ($13m per again)
>>>
>>>
>>>Josh Hamilton goes to Angels for 5 years/$125m.-- 
>>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>"Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>[email protected].
>>>For more options, visit this group at 
>>>http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>"Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>[email protected].
>>>For more options, visit this group at 
>>>http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>-- 
>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>"Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>[email protected].
>>For more options, visit this group at 
>>http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
>Sox Citizens" group.
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>[email protected].
>For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
>
-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
>Sox Citizens" group.
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>[email protected].
>For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
>
> -- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
>Sox Citizens" group.
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>[email protected].
>For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to