|
Thanks All----Sounds like I'd better go with some
sort of hard line for my between unit RF interconnects to keep between
cable leakage to tolerable limits----and probably noise too. But this brings up
another issue: forgetting about noise for the moment ---how can a 214 type cable
which is listed as 97-98% shielded have lower leakage (desense problems) than a
foil cable listed as 100% shielded?
The big question-------what is the most economical
combination of small diameter hard line and an "N" compatible connector
assembly?--------is there something that can be done with say 1/4" superflex and
the affordable solder through the holes teflon "N" connector that is similar to
the 259 "UHF" connector?----what is the best way to go?
And another-------I've seen military microwave gear
interconnected with hardline less than 1/4" diameter ---smooth tubing---with
soldered on "N" connectors-----like is used in mobile helical duplexers-----is
this system suitable and where does it come from?
Thanks much, 73
Scott, N6NXI
|
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question N�ATH
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question Mark Holman
- RE: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question Scott
- RE: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question Richard W. Solomon
- RE: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question N9WYS
- RE: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question Robin
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question James
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question Neil McKie
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question Kevin Custer
- RE: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question Joe
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question dcflux
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question Glenn Little WB4UIV
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question Neil McKie

