Lawyers ??
 

73, Dick, W1KSZ

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Scott
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question

Thanks All----Sounds like I'd better go with some sort of hard line for my between unit RF interconnects to keep between cable leakage to tolerable limits----and probably noise too. But this brings up another issue: forgetting about noise for the moment ---how can a 214 type cable which is listed as 97-98% shielded have lower leakage (desense problems) than a foil cable listed as 100% shielded?
 
The big question-------what is the most economical combination of small diameter hard line and an "N" compatible connector assembly?--------is there something that can be done with say 1/4" superflex and the affordable solder through the holes teflon "N" connector that is similar to the 259 "UHF" connector?----what is the best way to go?
 
And another-------I've seen military microwave gear interconnected with hardline less than 1/4" diameter ---smooth tubing---with soldered on "N" connectors-----like is used in mobile helical duplexers-----is this system suitable and where does it come from?
 
Thanks much, 73
Scott, N6NXI
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 5:44 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Question

OK guys ---I hear you all saying that hard line is better but none of you have said what is the actual problem with 9913 flex or LMR-400. In other words---What is wrong with a quality foil under braid "100%"shielded foam cable and I'm assuming use between receiver and  duplexer, transmitter and duplexer and duplexer and antenna?
 
 And then the next question that follows is that inside a cabinet full of stuff where 1/2 inch hard line is just to stiff -----what do you suggest ---and in this case assume that we are talking about three or four repeaters----yes, receivers, transmitters, isolators and duplexers all in the same rack cabinet?
 
Scott
N6NXI




















Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to