|
I think what Chuck was getting at was the 'automatic' beamtilt of a
vertical omni collinear (usually fiberglass) when it is run outside of
its specified bandwidth. As a function of the element length in a
coaxial collinear as compared to the applied frequency, the vertical
beam pattern will change with applied frequency. If a coaxial
collinear is fed with a signal that is exactly on its design frequency,
the vertical beam pattern will be centered about the antenna, and the
antenna will be at its highest radiating efficiency. If a coaxial
collinear is fed with a signal that is 2% lower than its design, the
antenna will exhibit a vertical beam downtilt of approximately 3
degrees and suffer approximately 10% loss in overall gain. If a signal
that is 2% higher than the antenna design is fed into a coaxial
collinear, vertical beam uptilt of approximately 3 degrees will occur,
and again a loss of overall gain. These instances are not the case with binary or corporate fed dipole arrays, as the phasing harness predominantly controls the vertical beam pattern. Beam Tilt and efficiency doesn't change very much with applied frequency, and is one reason that the exposed dipole array is a better choice where wide band operation is required. Kevin Custer skipp025 wrote: Kind of loaded question/statement/answer really. All antennas have both horizontal and vertical beamwidth. Depending on what you think is beam-tilt... one could and some do say all antennas have a beam tilt and or a beam width. Others combine the description...In the more commercial world of antennas, we now see vertical omni repeater site antennas with adjustable beam tilt. But I'm not sure if I'd say they have to be made with fiberglass radomes (covers). There's more than one method used by the various mfgrs to adjust the beam tilt - beam width. For the most part we only see some models with adjustable setting in some vertical omni models with composite radomes. ... and you pay serious money for the adjustable beam tilt models. If you pay attention to the specs, you'll see values for the horizontal, vertitcal beam width and where needed, the/any adjustable beam tilt values. Your results will probably vary... cheers, skippChuck Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I believe the down tilt issue only happens with the fiberglass antennas. Chuck WB2EDV wa9ba wrote: YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] DB224 Antennas Mathew Quaife
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] DB224 Antennas DCFluX
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB224 Antennas skipp025
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB224 Antennas Mathew Quaife
- [Repeater-Builder] icom ic40g Ian Wells
- [Repeater-Builder] down tilt skipp025
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] down tilt Kevin Custer
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] down tilt Chuck Kelsey
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] down tilt bradley glen
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] down tilt Kevin Custer
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] down tilt bradley glen
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] down tilt Brett
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] down tilt david vanhorn

