There's also the code in maven-new/fetch. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/10/2003 11:24:59 PM: > > Leo Simons wrote: > > > As for standards, I like the concensus we arrived at > > (and I would be highly against changing that again now > > as its just a major pain in the **** to move 100s of > > files around). > > From my site, I totally agree. > > > As for code, well, personally, not really. > > Maven worksforme :D. But it could be a good idea > > nevertheless. > > We must cater for all projects, not only Maven-enabled ones. > Yes, it's possible to take away the code from Maven and make that > indipendent, but again I propose to start from Version and Ruper, as > IMHO they are more complete as a repository solution. > > The bottom line is that I just want a versioning and repository system, > adn I don't like having to replicate things here and in krysalis. Hence > the proposal to move the code here and make all be able to access it and > work on it. > > In case some want to know, I have personally never touched the Ruper2 > code nor the Version code, and will not actively partecipate in its > development. But there is a small community at krysalis that is working > like mad on these things, and I think that it might be beneficial to > Apache if it happens here instead. > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >
