-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Malthe Borch wrote: > 2009/4/27 Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com>: >> I can't see much reason for us to try to share code with people who >> won't even attempt a rational evaluation of the candidate. -1 to >> bikeshedding this thing further; +1 to an 'svn rm'. > > I think the primary reason why people shy away from ``zope.component`` > is that it's abused too often; it's hard to see that it's really quite > simple when some users are multi-adapting four ways to look up a > viewlet which happens to rely on twenty other lookups to render > itself.
I think you are being generous: I have very little doubt that the objections come first from the presence of 'zope' in the package name, and second from the very idea of using a tool which codifies and categorizes abstractions, never mind the benefits. > Perhaps if campaigned a bit on the grounds of the relative ease-of-use > of the ZCA, we wouldn't have to dumb it down to the level of > ``repoze.plugin`` (no offense) in order to get adoption outside of > Zope. These are folks who, on the whole, prefer *code generation*, and place and extremely low value on abstraction and "pluggable reuse". I don't think repackaging is going to help the gag reflex. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ9fiA+gerLs4ltQ4RArkdAJ93UdkIupl5Xa52CHb4A+SmxBRAgQCfeoFW 9SG7sADfzbZehsa5KpQkcOk= =xHg2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repozefirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev