At 9:55 AM -0500 3/15/00, Rich Lafferty wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:19:46AM -0600, Verne Arase 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>  > Aren't you polluting the network with twice the traffic if you do this?
>
>I'm not sure I understand why; if you mount the netatalk-shared volume
>on the machine that's running retrospect, then you're still moving
>each file across the network once.
>
>Unfortunately, you throw away all of your ownership and permissions
information at the same time. :-/

Sorry ... I guess I never considered that you might want to mount the 
drives on your Retro server; for some reason I only considered doing 
it on a client.

Just my prejudices about keeping important machines as vanilla as 
possible, I suppose ...
-- 
It's not what you don't know that'll hurt you;
it's what you _do_ know that isn't so.


--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:        <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to