This would be a good reason to use MacNFS...it *should* keep the permissions, as that is part of NFS. john > From: Verne Arase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:15:01 -0600 > To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: retro-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Unix? > > At 9:55 AM -0500 3/15/00, Rich Lafferty wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:19:46AM -0600, Verne Arase >> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>> Aren't you polluting the network with twice the traffic if you do this? >> >> I'm not sure I understand why; if you mount the netatalk-shared volume >> on the machine that's running retrospect, then you're still moving >> each file across the network once. >> >> Unfortunately, you throw away all of your ownership and permissions > information at the same time. :-/ > > Sorry ... I guess I never considered that you might want to mount the > drives on your Retro server; for some reason I only considered doing > it on a client. > > Just my prejudices about keeping important machines as vanilla as > possible, I suppose ... > -- > It's not what you don't know that'll hurt you; > it's what you _do_ know that isn't so. > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
