I second this complaint. I would much prefer Retrospect to create a
directory with the name of the catalog and have files inside for each client
for faster file compares. Or at least let me break out a "big" client. A
file compare of a ~22G restore takes about 2hrs even if I want just *one*
file out of the bunch.
This fact has caused us to use a secondary HD to backup this one large chunk
of data.
adam...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Steven Karel
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 4:52 PM
> To: retro-talk
> Subject: Re: Anyone used Retrospect on medium-large systems?
>
>
> - with a lot of computers, the Retrospect catalog files can become
> large,
> and doing the comparisons between catalog and the current client
> filesystem structure prior to backing up each client can take a long
> time.
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/>
For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.
