And, another observation I can throw into the mix: if the 'set
submitted' is on, the diff cannot be loaded - regardless of
I'd be happy to upgrade to a newer version - but according to
Searching for ReviewBoard
Best match: ReviewBoard 0.9.dev-20081207
ReviewBoard 0.9.dev-20081207 is already the active version in easy-
Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
So - without going 'bleeding edge', I'm not sure what version to
upgrade to. How "bad" are the nightly builds (as per
Edge Releases)? Is that what I should do? What are the risks with
"downgrading"? I'm assuming the database upgrade does not downgrade
terribly well :(.
On Jan 12, 4:46 pm, Julius Malkiewicz <jpmalkiew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> Thanks for the reply. I've actually attempted to do this before -
> with no luck. What I have noticed that the diff fragments become
> available to the review submitters, but not to the reviewers - so it
> almost sounds like a permissions issue. I've hunted around in the
> admin interface, but cannot find anything that seems to relate. Does
> this shed any further light?
> On Jan 12, 4:36 pm, "Christian Hammond" <chip...@chipx86.com> wrote:
> > Hi Julius.
> > It sounds like you're using a version containing broken progressive diff
> > loading code. This was a bug for a short time and we since fixed it. I'd
> > recommend upgrading your install (which, now that you're using the new
> > install procedure, should be pretty easy and quick). Make sure to restart
> > your memcached server or you may have some diff rendering issues.
> > I don't know what broke ActiveDirectory support, but if you enable logging
> > you might be able to see some additional info. I don't know enough about
> > ActiveDirectory to really say what we need to do to fix it. Maybe someone
> > can figure it out and send us a patch?
> > Christian
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > VMware, Inc.
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Julius Malkiewicz
> > <jpmalkiew...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > I've been using review board for over a year - and I've been very
> > > impressed. I recently upgraded using the new install procedure (using
> > > ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_20081207), and a few things seem broken.
> > > The first (and most important) is that we get the "loading diff
> > > fragment" on my reviews, but they never turn into diff fragments (no
> > > matter how long we wait). I'm assuming the issue is either
> > > installation (as I've seen no one else complain of this issue) or how
> > > I upgraded from the previous release (early 2008) to this one (late
> > > 2008).
> > > The other significant change from the previous setup is that we're now
> > > using a memcached server. I'm not sure if this makes any difference.
> > > We're running a GNU/Linux distribution ( Ubuntu-Server 7.04 _Feisty
> > > Fawn_ - Release), and I'm very familiar with linux.
> > > I'm not familiar with django/json/etc (I'm a software engineer which
> > > deals with "C" and embedded devices :)). Any pointers in how I can
> > > diagnose (and/or solve) the issue? I'd also be happy with not
> > > "caching" the diff loading, but wait for the diff to load (ie,
> > > previous behavior).
> > > The other issues are "annoying" - we were previously able to
> > > authenticate against our ActiveDirectory LDAP, but that is no longer
> > > the case - I'd be curious to hear of success stories in that regard.
> > > Apologies in advance if any of these issues have been previously found
> > > and solved, but extensive searching has not yeilded any answers.
> > > Many thanks,
> > > Julius.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at