Hi Christian, Don't I feel silly :). I've now performed (as root): # easy_install --upgrade ReviewBoard Djblets # sudo rb-site upgrade somepath/reviewboard .. and restarted memcached.
This installed: Djblets-0.4.dev_20090109-py2.5.egg ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_20090109-py2.5.egg Initially, there was no change - until I restarted the webserver (I'm running mod_python) ... and now it all looks fine. Many thanks for your help ... Keep up the good work :). Julius. Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi Julius. > > easy_install by default won't upgrade a package. That's why it's still on > the 20081207 package, instead of last night's nightly. You'll need to use > the --upgrade flag. The Getting Started guide has some instructions for > what's needed for package and site upgrades, but in short, make sure you do: > > easy_install --upgrade ReviewBoard Djblets > > Then do the site upgrades as described in the guide, and restart memcached. > That should fix the problem. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > VMware, Inc. > > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Julius Malkiewicz > <jpmalkiew...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > And, another observation I can throw into the mix: if the 'set > > submitted' is on, the diff cannot be loaded - regardless of > > 'permissions'. > > > > I'd be happy to upgrade to a newer version - but according to > > 'easy_install ReviewBoard': > > Searching for ReviewBoard > > Best match: ReviewBoard 0.9.dev-20081207 > > Processing ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_20081207-py2.5.egg > > ReviewBoard 0.9.dev-20081207 is already the active version in easy- > > install.pth > > Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin > > > > Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_20081207- > > py2.5.egg > > Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard > > > > So - without going 'bleeding edge', I'm not sure what version to > > upgrade to. How "bad" are the nightly builds (as per > > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/GettingStarted, Bleeding > > Edge Releases)? Is that what I should do? What are the risks with > > "downgrading"? I'm assuming the database upgrade does not downgrade > > terribly well :(. > > > > Many thanks, > > Julius. > > > > On Jan 12, 4:46 pm, Julius Malkiewicz <jpmalkiew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Christian, > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. I've actually attempted to do this before - > > > with no luck. What I have noticed that the diff fragments become > > > available to the review submitters, but not to the reviewers - so it > > > almost sounds like a permissions issue. I've hunted around in the > > > admin interface, but cannot find anything that seems to relate. Does > > > this shed any further light? > > > > > > Julius. > > > > > > On Jan 12, 4:36 pm, "Christian Hammond" <chip...@chipx86.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Julius. > > > > > > > It sounds like you're using a version containing broken progressive > > diff > > > > loading code. This was a bug for a short time and we since fixed it. > > I'd > > > > recommend upgrading your install (which, now that you're using the new > > > > install procedure, should be pretty easy and quick). Make sure to > > restart > > > > your memcached server or you may have some diff rendering issues. > > > > > > > I don't know what broke ActiveDirectory support, but if you enable > > logging > > > > you might be able to see some additional info. I don't know enough > > about > > > > ActiveDirectory to really say what we need to do to fix it. Maybe > > someone > > > > can figure it out and send us a patch? > > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > > -- > > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > > > VMware, Inc. > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Julius Malkiewicz > > > > <jpmalkiew...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > I've been using review board for over a year - and I've been very > > > > > impressed. I recently upgraded using the new install procedure > > (using > > > > > ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_20081207), and a few things seem broken. > > > > > > > > The first (and most important) is that we get the "loading diff > > > > > fragment" on my reviews, but they never turn into diff fragments (no > > > > > matter how long we wait). I'm assuming the issue is either > > > > > installation (as I've seen no one else complain of this issue) or how > > > > > I upgraded from the previous release (early 2008) to this one (late > > > > > 2008). > > > > > > > > The other significant change from the previous setup is that we're > > now > > > > > using a memcached server. I'm not sure if this makes any difference. > > > > > > > > We're running a GNU/Linux distribution ( Ubuntu-Server 7.04 _Feisty > > > > > Fawn_ - Release), and I'm very familiar with linux. > > > > > > > > I'm not familiar with django/json/etc (I'm a software engineer which > > > > > deals with "C" and embedded devices :)). Any pointers in how I can > > > > > diagnose (and/or solve) the issue? I'd also be happy with not > > > > > "caching" the diff loading, but wait for the diff to load (ie, > > > > > previous behavior). > > > > > > > > The other issues are "annoying" - we were previously able to > > > > > authenticate against our ActiveDirectory LDAP, but that is no longer > > > > > the case - I'd be curious to hear of success stories in that regard. > > > > > > > > Apologies in advance if any of these issues have been previously > > found > > > > > and solved, but extensive searching has not yeilded any answers. > > > > > > > > Many thanks, > > > > > > > > Julius. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
