On Jun 24, 1:28 pm, Gordon Morehouse <gordon.moreho...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've now replicated this on an entirely different RB 1.5 beta 2 > installation running on Debian Lenny. I will file a bug report.
...and it turns out the bug report was filed against the documentation, because upon looking at the failed patch files again, I realized Review Board was trying to apply the diff against the HTML output from the Mercurial HTTP browseable repo, not the file in question. All of this could have been avoided if there were any documentation on how to set up a Mercurial repo. It currently doesn't work over HTTPS or SSH for me (HTTPS with the aforementioned problems, SSH with a 'no suitable response from remote hg'). Solution: I've asked in a separate thread whether or not Review Board supports remote Mercurial repos; for now, mounted a network share from the server where the hg repos live and replaced the path (formerly an HTTPS URL) with a filesystem path. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en