Ah thanks for the explanation!

Matthew, maybe give the version in the release-1.7.x branch in Git a try.

Christian


On Dec 12, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Stephen Gallagher <step...@gallagherhome.com> 
wrote:

> On Wed 12 Dec 2012 03:30:09 PM EST, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> If you have lessc locally, this will stop happening. Make sure you can run 
>> that on the command line. I don't know if lessjs is something else or not.
>> 
>> The final 1.7 release doesn't use bless anymore, so it'll require lessc for 
>> packaging.
>> 
>> Christian
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 12, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2012-12-07 22:56, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>> Hi Derek,
>>>> 
>>>> 1.7 RC makes use of a local lessc compiler.
>>> 
>>> I'm getting an error (see below) trying to build 1.7RC1... I'm guessing 
>>> this is the same problem (I am also trying to roll a Fedora package for 
>>> testing purposes).
>>> 
>>> I'd really like to be able to roll a package in order to test if the UI 
>>> issues I've seen are fixed. Is there any way to get past this? (I have 
>>> lessjs installed...)
>>> 
> 
> I assume he's talking about the proposed package here: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857843 which is going to be 
> included in Fedora as soon as the Node.js package is complete (Which will be 
> before the week is out, assuming that Node.js upstream finally releases 0.9.4 
> with my changes).
> 
> This package does produce a file /usr/bin/lessc which would be in the path, 
> so I'm not sure what else is going on there. I haven't had a chance to test 
> this myself; I'll try to take a look at it tonight.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Reply via email to