On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 3:00:31 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Steve, > > It's pretty hard for us to do support for post-review, since it's > completely obsolete (and 0.5.2 is pretty old). That said, can you give us > the output of running post-review with --debug in a case where this problem > is showing up? > > BTW, why are you planning to upgrade to 0.6.3 instead of 0.7.3? >
I'd like to upgrade to 0.7.x but I can't because of Issue 3864. I'll try to test this repo problem with a newer RBTools just to see if the problem is with RBTools or the server. Thanks --Steve > > -David > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:36 AM Steve <seide...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> I forgot to mention that I restarted memcached on the servers too, but >> the problem persists. >> >> --steve >> >> >> On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 9:28:21 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote: >>> >>> We changed our DNS entry for our perforce server over the weekend which >>> required me to change our port settings in ReviewBoard. I edited the repo >>> setting in the RB admin console and changed the name an path like this: >>> >>> # Old >>> Name: oldname:1666 >>> Path: oldname:1666 >>> >>> # New >>> Name: perforce:1666 >>> Path: perforce:1666 >>> >>> The string 'perforce:1666' is what is returned by 'p4 info' as the >>> 'Server address'. This works fine in the sense that all the old reviews >>> show the new perforce port string and the diffs are being properly >>> displayed. The problem occurs when we try to update a review that was >>> created prior to the DNS change using post-review. Instead of updating the >>> old review, it creates a new one. I've told my users they can get around >>> this for the old reviews by adding the -r option to specify the review >>> board id, but I'd like to understand what I may have done wrong. >>> >>> We are currently using RBTools 0.5.2 and post-review, but we're planning >>> to upgrade soon to 0.6.3 and rbt. Our RB version is 1.7.28. I'll try to >>> test with the new RBTools, but I have a limited amount of old reviews that >>> I can play with. >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> --Steve >>> >>> -- >> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >> https://rbcommons.com/ >> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
