Csaba Ringhofer has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/24041 )

Change subject: IMPALA-14583: Support partial RPC dispatch for Iceberg tables
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(1 comment)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24041/3/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/IcebergContentFileStore.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/IcebergContentFileStore.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24041/3/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/IcebergContentFileStore.java@162
PS3, Line 162:       if (startOffset == 0 && endOffset == fileDescList_.size()) 
return toThrift();
             :
             :       if (reverseMap_ == null) {
             :
> 'reverseMap' has got some backlash already. What about this: change it to a
Adding some more backlash for the reverse map :) A hash map should take around 
30-40 bytes per entry, so 30-40MB for a 1 M file table where the pagination 
would be actually used. This is not ignorable, in the local table I use for 
benchmark the IcebergContentFileStore takes around 400-450MB, so it's nearly 
10% overhead.

I would switch back to generating it on each request (my guess is that it is 
not that slow), or use a soft reference to make it GCable if the catalogd runs 
out of memory completely.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/24041
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7f2c058b7cc8efc15bac9fe0e91baadbb7b92cbb
Gerrit-Change-Number: 24041
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Mihaly Szjatinya <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Csaba Ringhofer <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mihaly Szjatinya <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Quanlong Huang <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Zoltan Borok-Nagy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 09:12:21 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to