Hi Leo,
Apologies for not being clear. I support the draft as is with the change
of removing the PC role. You can put me as a ✓ in the table.
Cheers,
Gergana
On 29/03/2021 10:30, Leo Vegoda wrote:
Dear RIPE Community,
I'd like to thank everyone who has already commented on this draft
update to the Code of Conduct so far.
I have been keeping track of the comments so the TF has a good idea of
what changes we need to make to the draft. I've tabulated them below and
it would be good if people could let me know if I have misunderstood
what they meant. Also, some people have commented but not stated if they
support the daft as is, or would support the draft with a minor change.
I've placed a question mark next to names where I'm not sure what a
person's position is. It would be great if you could clarify your position.
Many thanks,
Leo Vegoda
On behalf of the RIPE Code of Conduct TF
Commenter
Support
Comment or Delta
Eileen Gallagher
✓
Add: acknowledgments of earlier work done by others when presenting new work
Add: thanking people for their contribution as an example of positive
behaviour
Comment: RIPE NCC might want to incorporate the CoC into contracts with
venues
Randy Bush
✓
Keep the CoC tight
Vesna Manojlovic
✓
Add: definition of the CoC Team
Add: call to action
Nit: Add date and authors
Nit: Change “for more than quarter of a century” to “since 1989”
Nit: make the URL ripe.net/coc <http://ripe.net/coc>
Nit: Rename "Behaviour" title to "Inclusive Behaviour" or another
alternative
Nit: "people protected" -> remove bullet points, make it a CSV line of text
Gert Doering
✓
—
Maximilian Wilhelm
✓
—
Daniel Karrenberg
✓
Focus more on principles and make it even clearer that the lists are
examples and not comprehensive
Do not give the PC a special role
Nit: Change “national laws” to “laws”
Nit: ONly talk about roles and organisations in the community in general
terms
Stated that the obligation to report crimes is very limited
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
?
Nit: Number all sections
Rationale must balance inclusivity against freedom of speech and
cultural differences
Include all ways of communicating over the Internet
Does not understand why the PC needs to be consulted
Does contracted workers include subcontractors?
Wants the RIPE NCC staff to always intermediate if a report is made to
the police and understands that there could be liability if people know
of an incident and do not report it
Add protection for those who do not speak English as a first language
Does not think "calling people names" is clear for non-native speakers
Rephrase “Deliberately outing private details about someone without
their consent”
Rephrase “Pushing someone to drink or take drugs”
Add a prohibition against spam
Forbid using language a non-native speaker might misunderstand
Similarly, the CoC Team should accommodate cultural differences
Wants the process in the same document
Sasha Romijn
?
Question about how the team would determine if an act should be reported
to the police and a preference for that to be controlled by the subject
of the act
Jim Reid
?
Supports Sasha on police report issue
Sander Steffann
?
Supports Sasha on police report issue
Gergana Petrova
?
Clarification on making a police report
Echoes the question about the role of the PC (see above)
Rob Evans
?
Trusted Contacts training gave him the understanding that there is no
obligation to make police reports. Trusted Contacts are confidential
contacts
Fearghas Mckay
?
Confidentiality and control are important in helping people have the
confidence to make a report
_______________________________________________
diversity mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
