CatBus;175922 Wrote: > You're also achieving a better filesize than any lossless compression > can ever hope to achieve. > > One could easily argue (if one were feeling argumentative) that the > only thing you achieve by insisting on FLAC as your format of choice is > that you don't have to go through the trouble of determining at which > quality level MP3 is totally transparent and sounds exactly like the CD > source, with the end result being that with FLAC you will waste a lot of > disk space for something you have yet to prove is even audibly different > than MP3. > > Not that I use MP3 myself, but let's tone down the old time religion a > bit and just be helpful.
You may not be able to tell the difference between an mp3 (I don't care what bitrate you've ripped it at) and a CD track, but many of us most certainly can. If you cannot, either your hearing is impaired or you're using crappy equipment, or of course, both. -- egd Linux and loving IT! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ egd's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3425 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32138 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
