mswlogo;196317 Wrote: > Horse power most certainly can make difference in more accurate > interpolation. The more points (higher order) the more accurate the > interpolation. The more points the more computing power needed to do it > within the same amount of time. > >
While its true that a complex multi-point interpolation will require a bit of computing grunt, at audio frequency levels that really isn't very much these days. But the real point is still your "more accurate" claim. Sorry, you have absolutely no way of knowing that your interpolated values are "more accurate". To know this, you'd have to know something more about the original signal which by definition we don't. Now, if you start from the assumption that the interpolated values in your newly extended sample should run linearly (or actually in any other more complex shape you might want to consider) between the "real" samples, then indeed your interpolated signal is "better" than the one you started with. But that's one hell of an assumption! Or, to put it another way, a "guess". If that doesn't convince you, I give up. Believe anyone's marketing hype you like! Ceejay -- ceejay ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ceejay's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=148 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34626 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
