>eg. winamp / gracenote assigns some CDs as "Various Artists"  thats an
>indication its a comp as far as that field is concerned.
>
What do you mean "assigns some CD's"?  Do you mean when ripping, or when 
scanning into the library?

Entering an arbitrary name is not true indicator of a compilation.  How can it 
be, other than for a human being to interpret the name.  It is not a 
compilation, it's an album by an artist called "Various Artists".  And another 
album by "Various" would be exactly that, not a compilation, and nothing 
linking the two albums to both be considered browsable as a group of 
compilation albums.

>i am pretty sure itunes does the same thing, AND assigns a comp=1 tag.
>
You are wrong.
The only albums in iTunes that are compilations are ones that have 
ITUNESCOMPILATION=1.  If I were to enter an album artist name of "Various 
Artists" (or any other text that you may like a computer to automatically 
consider to be a compilation) it will not be detected automatically as a 
compilation.  It would be listed under "Various Artists", not under 
"Compilations".

iTunes will group songs onto an album if they have an album artist tag.

>it is reality, its just you don't want to acknowledge it b/c it doesn't
>jive with what you consider to be correct.
>
it is not reality, its just you don't want to acknowledge it b/c it doesn't 
jive with what you consider to be correct.

I like my library to represent reality; the information that is actually on my 
CD's, how I file them in my big cabinet of CDs.

You are saying I should be able to take an album, say "Dark Side of the Moon", 
and set Compilation=1.  Fine, SC can allow you to do that, but that's not 
reality.  In reality, the album is not a compilation, and without custom tags 
to override the correct behaviour, it would never be considered a compilation.

If there were a guest performer on Dark Side of the Moon, say Frank Sinatra was 
discovered as the actual singer on Us And Them, I would want to set Album 
Artist=Pink Floyd to prevent it being a Compilation album.  Setting 
Compilation=0 should be irrelevant, as it is the album artist that defines the 
album as being a Pink Floyd album, and thus not a compilation.  Setting 
Compilation=1 would not be reality; a decision would need to be made as to what 
album artist it would then appear under: Pink Floyd, Frank Sinatra or Various 
Artists?

You say in your world, every song in your library should have an album artist.  
This is no standard, and no app forces that.  That is a restriction you have 
imposed on yourself in your own parallel non-reality.

What about songs that are not on albums?  Do you still set album artists for 
them?

>i already said you may be right in an academic sense, but in the
>pragmatic sense this is not the reality on the ground, the defacto
>standard out there.
Enough of your defacto standards - there is no such word "defacto".  A 
spell-check suggests "defective" :-)  The term you are looking for is "De 
facto", which is latin meaning "in practice".

What you discuss is not a de facto standard.  In practice there are many 
different ways that people work.

_______________________________________________
ripping mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping

Reply via email to