Philip Meyer;379088 Wrote: > > I just thought of something else - my track numbers also have total > track counts, so the last track on discnumber 01/02 is track 09/09. > As I said in my post an hour ago, on Linux it sorts alphabetically by filename, so the last track will be the filename in the directory which is last according to the alphabet.
So if you have filenames like: 01 sometrack.mp3 (with tracknum=1) 02 someothertrack.mp3 (with tracknum=2) Then "02 someothertrack.mp3" is going to be the last. If you instead have filenames like: sometrack.mp3 (with tracknum=1) someothertrack.mp3 (with tracknum=2) Then "sometrack.mp3" is going to be the last even though it has the first track number. So to sum it up, it's not strange that it is hard to reproduce because the actual filenames are also involved it's not just the tags. In my real setup yesterday I had filenames which started with tracknum with an extra 0 if tracknum<10, so in that setup the tracks was ordered according to track number. -- erland Erland Isaksson 'My homepage' (http://erland.isaksson.info) 'My download page' (http://erland.isaksson.info/download) (Developer of 'TrackStat, SQLPlayList, DynamicPlayList, Custom Browse, Custom Scan, Custom Skip, Multi Library, Title Switcher and Database Query plugins' (http://wiki.erland.isaksson.info/index.php/Category:SlimServer)) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57589 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
