>So to sum it up, it's not strange that it is hard to reproduce because
>the actual filenames are also involved it's not just the tags. In my
>real setup yesterday I had filenames which started with tracknum with
>an extra 0 if  tracknum<10, so in that setup the tracks was ordered
>according to track number.
>
I always name album track files with leading 0's to get them ordered correctly 
in the OS.  Normally, where I keep disk numbers on multi-disk rips and rip to 
the same folder, I name the files with "dd - tt - title" (dd = discnumber, 
tt=tracknumber).  In the fews cases that are like yours (some of my older 
albums), I have ripped with disks in sub-folders, with "tt - title" naming 
convention within each disk folder.

None of the artists on disk 1 appear on disk 2, which I thought was what you 
were saying causes the issue.  So no matter what order the files are scanned, 
you would expect it to fail for me?

Phil
_______________________________________________
ripping mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping

Reply via email to