Good, really neat! I suppose this result is suggesting we drop TclX and
replace that function with our homemade kill proc with a cautionary
timing that could help to make tests at least reproducible.
cheers
-- Massimo
On 02/07/2018 06:36 PM, Ronnie Brunner wrote:
Hi Massimo
Well, who would have thought: I made the testsuite work for the
worker mpm, by just giving my pseudo kill proc to fake TclX a bit
more time (5 secs) to do the job ☺. I noticed that I didn’t get the
same result always, that’s why I suspected a timing issue… The tests
run forever now, but nothing fails for the worker mpm anymore!
I still got only 83 tests though, but I’ll have to look into that
another time. As for now, I guess, I scared you for nothing. Sorry
for that!
Gruess Ronnie -- We innovate. You win. http://netcetera.com
Ronnie Brunner | ronnie.brun...@netcetera.com | T +41 44 297 59 79 |
Netcetera AG | 8040 Zürich | Switzerland | http://netcetera.com |
From: Massimo MANGHI [mailto:massimo.man...@unipr.it] Sent: Dienstag,
6. Februar 2018 21:01 To: Ronnie Brunner
<ronnie.brun...@netcetera.com>; Massimo Manghi
<massimo.man...@alice.it>; petas...@yahoo.gr Cc:
rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org Subject: Re: Rivet 3.0.1
Thank you Ronnie, still the discrepancy between my PC and yours
bothers me quite a bit. I would like to have more time to
investigate, in the meanwhile would you sent over your error_log and
output? Thank you
-- Massimo Manghi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscr...@tcl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-h...@tcl.apache.org
