You might be the one to find out why, then. Every distro installs and runs different background programs. First check to see which ones your current distro is running and then compare that with RL's. BTW, "i386" does not mean it may not be optimized for a later CPU. I had problems with a genuine 486 when what I got was optimized for a 586. That may be an argument for rebuilding source rpms.
RBE At 09:40 AM 1/16/02 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I guess I should have clarified. I meant is it slow compared to other 2.4 kernel distro's, ie Mandrake 8.1, SuSe 7.3, RedHat 7.2. I have been using linux for quite awhile now (about five years or so) started out with RedHat and stayed with it, then went to SuSe 7.2, 7.3. I am currently running Mandrake 8.1 and I like it alot. No speed problems at all (of course it is i586 optimized)however, SuSe 7.3 is i386 and it seems to run just as fast. Pretty much the same with RedHat 7.2. I have installed and ran all of these distro's on the same computer >Athlon 1.4 GHz >40 Gig Hard Drive >512 Mb DDR Ram >24x10x40 CDrw >Ensoniq Sound card >ATI Xpert 2000 video card > >With both ext3 and Reiser as the file system. > >I have not installed RedmondLinux on this computer yet. I plan on trying it out in the next day or so. I just wanted to know if it really is slower than all of the other distro's (like I have heard some people claim it was)? It looks like a good distro that has a nice clean design, I just hope it is not as slow as some people have said it is. Also why not includ the OpenGL drivers with the distrobution and just charge for new updated games or charge for new drivers as they become available. > >Lanny > >> From: Joseph Cheek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 2002/01/16 Wed AM 03:40:31 EST >> To: Sandy Oppegard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> CC: RedmondLunix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [rl-users] Redmond linux slow? >> >> hi all, >> >> RL has three things that slow it down over other distros: >> >> - ext3 file system by default - slower than ext2 because of the journal >> writes and syncs necessary. >> >> - kautorun - this app has to poll the cdrom. with some ide >> controllers/cdroms it can really eat up cpu resources. on this old dell >> laptop i'm using now [pentium/mmx 233] it only takes 1% when active, .35% >> when inactive. but others have reported 10% or more cpu time. >> >> - kernel inefficiency - the currently shipped RL kernel has some speed >> issues in it. >> >> of course, having kde2 as the default wm/desktop doesn't help, and since >> we don't load opengl drivers by default the video may be sluggish. >> >> thanks! >> joe >> >> Joseph Cheek >> CTO and Founder, Redmond Linux Corp. >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.redmondlinux.org >> Redmond Linux. Linux for the desktop. [tm] >> >> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Sandy Oppegard wrote: >> >> > I think someone else may have eluded to this, but having a lot of processes >> > running in the background can slow your machine to a crawl as well. Using >> > something like KDE System Guard can identify running processes and let you >> > shut down or kill the ones that are hogging resources. I currently have >> > Mandrake 8.1 running on a P166 with 94 mb of ram. While it's no "speed >> > demon", it runs faster than it did when I had Windows 95 installed on it! >> > However, some applications seem to hang on to resources and not let go, even >> > after they've been closed(K-Office will do this).........sort of like some >> > windows apps do :) At least in Linux you can actually find the offender and >> > "kill him" without having to "reboot"! I agree with Rodd's comments about >> > the windows managers and apps designed to run on newer machines. If you're >> > using an old machine, forget Enlightenment and Ximian's Evolution! :) Good >> > Window Managers for old machines are Black Box, fvwm and WindowMaker. >> > >> > Sandy >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Ahrenstorff, Rodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: "'Lanny'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "RedmondLunix" >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:10 PM >> > Subject: RE: [rl-users] Redmond linux slow? >> > >> > >> > > This distro is not shipping with object-prelinked RPMs and may not be >> > > optimized for all processors. However, most Linux distibutions aren't. >> > > Running RPMs optimized for i686 processors on your Pentium II won't help >> > the >> > > situation any. So most distros don't perform the optimization process for >> > > every included package. They can't predict what processor your using. >> > > However, you can download prelinked and optimized RPMs from Texstar at >> > > www.pclinuxonline.com. >> > > >> > > Another issue often brought up by persons new to Linux concerns the >> > > comparison of Win98 and their new Linux distro. Often they say it is >> > > slower. Well Windows 98 is four years old! The GUI is prehistoric by KDE >> > > standards. With all the "eye candy" provided in the new Linux desktops a >> > > 233Mhz computer will run a little slow. But install Windows XP and you'll >> > > get the same results. I personally have installed Mandrake 8.1, Redhat >> > 7.2, >> > > Elx Linux pre1, Redmond 44, and Win2k on my main home PC (1.3Ghz AMD, >> > 256MB >> > > DDR RAM, ATA 100, etc..). There is little difference in speed between all >> > > of them. I have also installed them all on my spare PC (233Mhz PII, 256MB >> > > RAM, ATA 33, etc..) and again they run about the same speed. >> > > >> > > If you use older equipment you need to use "lighter" windows managers with >> > > less "eye candy". There are many available in Linux. Unfortunately, old >> > > hardware and "light weight" is not the future of the desktop market. >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Lanny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:59 PM >> > > To: RedmondLunix >> > > Subject: [rl-users] Redmond linux slow? >> > > >> > > >> > > I have heard alot of people say that RedmondLinux is slow. Is this correct >> > > and if so why? >> > > >> > > Lanny >> > > >> > > - >> > > -- >> > > rl-users list. To leave, send "unsubscribe" without quotes in body of >> > > message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/rl-users@chicago.redmondlinux.org/ >> > > - >> > > -- >> > > rl-users list. To leave, send "unsubscribe" without quotes in body of >> > > message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/rl-users@chicago.redmondlinux.org/ >> > > >> > >> > - >> > -- >> > rl-users list. To leave, send "unsubscribe" without quotes in body of >> > message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/rl-users@chicago.redmondlinux.org/ >> > >> >> - >> -- >> rl-users list. To leave, send "unsubscribe" without quotes in body of >> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/rl-users@chicago.redmondlinux.org/ >> > > >- >-- >rl-users list. To leave, send "unsubscribe" without quotes in body of >message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/rl-users@chicago.redmondlinux.org/ > - -- rl-users list. To leave, send "unsubscribe" without quotes in body of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/rl-users@chicago.redmondlinux.org/
