Thanks Anil. We're ready for 3.0 Unless I hear an objection tonight, I will make the release tomorrow morning.
- Dave On 11/6/06, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I verified the GPG sigs on the following files I found there. % gpg --verify apache-roller-3.0-rc6-incubating.tar.gz.asc apache-roller-3.0-rc6-incubating.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Mon 06 Nov 2006 06:33:11 AM PST using DSA key ID 17AA5B25 gpg: Good signature from "David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" % gpg --verify apache-roller-3.0-rc6-incubating.zip.asc apache-roller-3.0-rc6-incubating.zip gpg: Signature made Mon 06 Nov 2006 06:33:13 AM PST using DSA key ID 17AA5B25 gpg: Good signature from "David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" % gpg --verify apache-roller-src-3.0-rc6-incubating.tar.gz.asc apache-roller-src-3.0-rc6-incubating.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Mon 06 Nov 2006 06:33:17 AM PST using DSA key ID 17AA5B25 gpg: Good signature from "David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" % gpg --verify apache-roller-src-3.0-rc6-incubating.zip.asc apache-roller-src-3.0-rc6-incubating.zip gpg: Signature made Mon 06 Nov 2006 06:33:19 AM PST using DSA key ID 17AA5B25 gpg: Good signature from "David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:38 AM Subject: Re: RC5 -- Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller (incubating) 3.0 > On 11/5/06, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> OK. I did an installation with the RC6 distribution indicated in the >> link. >> Installed and did some very cursory testing. >> I'm +1 (didn't get a chance to do more complete testing but it looks >> fine). > > Thanks! > >> Pre-release requirements: >> - Correct naming anomaly: The distribution has RC5 in the name but is >> in >> the RC6 directory. I assumed this is RC6. > > I mis-named the files. FIXED. > >> - No GPG sig. We should make one and have at least one other committer >> verify. > > I forgot to sign this batch of RC files. FIXED. > Somebody want to verify the signatures? > [Snip...]
