I verified the GPG sigs on the following files I found there.
% gpg --verify apache-roller-3.0-rc6-incubating.tar.gz.asc
apache-roller-3.0-rc6-incubating.tar.gz
gpg: Signature made Mon 06 Nov 2006 06:33:11 AM PST using DSA key ID
17AA5B25
gpg: Good signature from "David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
% gpg --verify apache-roller-3.0-rc6-incubating.zip.asc
apache-roller-3.0-rc6-incubating.zip
gpg: Signature made Mon 06 Nov 2006 06:33:13 AM PST using DSA key ID
17AA5B25
gpg: Good signature from "David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
% gpg --verify apache-roller-src-3.0-rc6-incubating.tar.gz.asc
apache-roller-src-3.0-rc6-incubating.tar.gz
gpg: Signature made Mon 06 Nov 2006 06:33:17 AM PST using DSA key ID
17AA5B25
gpg: Good signature from "David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
% gpg --verify apache-roller-src-3.0-rc6-incubating.zip.asc
apache-roller-src-3.0-rc6-incubating.zip
gpg: Signature made Mon 06 Nov 2006 06:33:19 AM PST using DSA key ID
17AA5B25
gpg: Good signature from "David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: RC5 -- Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller (incubating) 3.0
On 11/5/06, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK. I did an installation with the RC6 distribution indicated in the
link.
Installed and did some very cursory testing.
I'm +1 (didn't get a chance to do more complete testing but it looks
fine).
Thanks!
Pre-release requirements:
- Correct naming anomaly: The distribution has RC5 in the name but is
in
the RC6 directory. I assumed this is RC6.
I mis-named the files. FIXED.
- No GPG sig. We should make one and have at least one other committer
verify.
I forgot to sign this batch of RC files. FIXED.
Somebody want to verify the signatures?
[Snip...]
