Matt Raible wrote:
I'm unable to set the "Handle of weblog to serve as frontpage blog" -
when I click save it clears the value and says "Changes saved". The
front page shows that this change hasn't been made. If I try to go to
http://localhost:8080/rd, I get:
java.lang.NullPointerException
org.apache.roller.config.RollerRuntimeConfig.isFrontPageWeblog(RollerRuntimeConfig.java:223)
org.apache.roller.config.RollerRuntimeConfig.isSiteWideWeblog(RollerRuntimeConfig.java:236)
Umm, something is seriously wrong with your setup if you are getting
null pointers from those methods. That basically means the app can't
get the runtime properties from the db. There weren't any other exceptions?
I can't help but think it's better to provide the current behavior
(aggregated front page) as the default, but allow an admin to set a
blog as the front page if they like. It seems like having a blog as
the front page is required - which won't work well for sites like
JavaLobby.org.
I disagree. I think the way it works now is fine and has been working
great for us on blogs.sun.com. The instructions for setting the
frontpage weblog are very simple and straight forward IMO.
Also, there is no requirement at all that the frontpage be a weblog,
that's just the default behavior. If the JavaLobby guys don't want a
weblog on the frontpage then all they have to do is modify the index.jsp
file at the root of the app and do whatever they want.
-- Allen
Matt
On 11/3/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/3/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I have removed JavaMail and Activation from the release, here's
RC6:
> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.0-rc6-incubating/
>
> I updated the Installation Guide to tell folks where to get the jars
> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/roller30-install-guide.pdf
>
> And I added the jars to the required jars downloads on Java.Net
> https://roller.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList
>
> I think we're basically ready for release. Anybody willing to do a
> quick test install and sanity check so we can ship it?
I'll do it.
Matt
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
>
> On 11/3/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/3/06, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ouch.
> > >
> > > An impertinent question, but are you sure you have them in the
right place
> > > after your rebuild and reinstallation (common/lib and only there)?\
> >
> > That's a good point. I tried moving the jars to common/lib (they've
> > always worked fine for me in WEB-INF/lib) and that prevented the
> > exception, but the mail does not go out so I guess I'm sticking with
> > removal.
> >
> > - Dave
> >
>
--
http://raibledesigns.com
