On 11/5/06, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK. I did an installation with the RC6 distribution indicated in the link.
Installed and did some very cursory testing.
I'm +1 (didn't get a chance to do more complete testing but it looks fine).
Thanks!
Pre-release requirements:
- Correct naming anomaly: The distribution has RC5 in the name but is in
the RC6 directory. I assumed this is RC6.
I mis-named the files. FIXED.
- No GPG sig. We should make one and have at least one other committer
verify.
I forgot to sign this batch of RC files. FIXED.
Somebody want to verify the signatures?
Other notes:
- It was a from-scratch db creation, not an upgrade. I did not test the
upgrade path. Not sure if Matt's issue is
along this path.
- I used the latest support site required jars package and the mail and
activation jars from that, and tested that e-mail comments worked. I'd
suggest that we try to distribute the redistributable versions in 3.1, but
this works fine for now.
Yes. I'd like to figure out how to ship working mail.jar and
activation.jar files in a later release.
- Dave
