Hi all, SMP or 64 bit processor support would be great. Too hard?
Cheers, Huw On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Can Tasan <beta...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I also have some ideas here, not fully sure about their feasibility. Tried > to be wise as much as I can. > > -Continuing USB work that vardanm started. Yes, I know a developer is > working on that. Another joining student would be great and speed up things. > > -Continuing TCP/IP stack work if noone is working on rewrite. > > -Working on DirectX support: bringing new features, fixing bugs, > optimising, if possible fixing some driver issues... > > -Fixing driver unloading/fallback problem (CORE-8294) I think it's a > hurdle on our hardware compatibility, but not sure its priority. > > -Would some kind of Win32 subsystem work be too hard? > > -Implementing some missing things in shell. > > -Implementing more user mode stuff, or is it enough for now? > > -Extending printing support. > > -Fixing current audio support, if our devs don't want to tinker with it. > > -Implementing WoW16 support. I suppose that'll draw attention. > > And as said before, proper application compatibility database. :) By the > way, I'm too pleased to join and see you here all! > > With my best regards, > Can Taşan > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
