That second Windows should have been ros.

On 17 March 2017 at 01:25, David Quintana (gigaherz) <gigah...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Running windows inside a vdm window isn't the same as running the apps
> directly in windows, as if they were native apps.
>
> On 17 March 2017 at 01:07, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <
> elh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> some people have had success in running Win 3.1 under ReactOS thanks to
>> NTDVM, so win3.1 apps can be run too :)
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:49 PM, David Quintana (gigaherz) <
>> gigah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That's not true. NTVDM is not WoW16. NTVDM is just DOS support. In order
>>> to support 16bit (windows 3.1) applications, a whole other system is needed.
>>>
>>> On 16 March 2017 at 23:37, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <
>>> elh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "-Implementing WoW16 support. I suppose that'll draw attention." -->
>>>> NTVDM, already done :)
>>>>
>>>> "Working on DirectX support: bringing new features, fixing bugs,
>>>> optimising, if possible fixing some driver issues..." ---> ReactX, would be
>>>> great!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Thomas Faber <thomas.fa...@reactos.org
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can tell you some possible next steps:
>>>>> - x64: implement PAE support in the 32 bit kernel
>>>>> - SMP: Implement resource translators and arbiters (I have some
>>>>> initial work for this somewhere)
>>>>> - Also SMP: build a CONFIG_SMP kernel (with some hack to use the
>>>>> regular HAL) and debug any issues coming from broken spinlock usage
>>>>>
>>>>> On March 16, 2017 5:50:39 AM EDT, Colin Finck <co...@reactos.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 16.03.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Huw Campbell:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  SMP or 64 bit processor support would be great. Too hard?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that's too much for a single GSoC student. But we also keep
>>>>>> saying this for a long time... The result is that everybody is afraid of
>>>>>> those "big topics".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What we need is some kernel dev looking into these topics and giving a
>>>>>> rough overview what needs to be done and in what places. Then we can
>>>>>> have a roadmap and split the work up into smaller tasks that are even
>>>>>> doable by GSoC students.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If nobody makes this first step, we will never have SMP or x64 CPU
>>>>>> support. People also kept saying that full printer support is too much
>>>>>> for a 6-month bachelor thesis, and they were right, but nevertheless I
>>>>>> was able to build the foundations and documentation in that
>>>>>> time.
>>>>>> And now I could guide everyone interested how to continue on achieving
>>>>>> full printing support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Colin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>>>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to