On Friday 16 March 2007 14:49, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Friday 16 Mar 2007 11:20, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > On Thursday 15 March 2007 15:09, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > > OK. I'll wait for Chris's input on this, in the meanwhile I'll keep > > > fleshing out the default chord dictionnary... now that's grunt work if > > > I've ever seen some. > > > > Sorry Chris, I figured you'd agree > > Well, yes, probably -- but honestly I don't quite see why my opinion would > make much difference, since I'm the one who can't play the guitar at all...
For some reason I seem to recall you were playing a bit. > > http://www.all-guitar-chords.com/guitar_chords_common.php > > > > That sounds adequate to me, what do you think ? > > Um, yes, maybe, looks OK -- I don't really know. > > I do quite like the way that KGuitar or whatever it's called these days > allows you to see actual frettings for lots of chords at once -- Not sure what you mean here. How is that different from what we have now ? (i.e. no filtering at all) > I can well > imagine a user finding it helpful to be able to pick chords on the basis of > what they look like as well as what they're called. But that's from a > standpoint of great and overarching ignorance. You mean displaying a bunch of fingerings for various roots and extensions, and letting the user pick one among these ? I don't quite see the context of that. -- Guillaume. http://telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
