On Friday 16 March 2007 7:20 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > for a simple classification over complexity. This page shows 3 categories : > beginner, common, all : > > http://www.all-guitar-chords.com/guitar_chords_common.php > > That sounds adequate to me, what do you think ?
A user flayed me off-list for the stupidity of my group by genre idea, so you're probably on the right track there. I don't know or care enough about the underlying theory to be able to use a better-organized system in a useful way, so grouping by whether they're diminished or inverted or blaggle blithized isn't going to help me. Beginner, common, all could work, or maybe group by the number of fingers required and/or frets spanned. Beginner chords are often two or three string cheater chords, then the next step up is the basic bread and butter vocabulary of chords that use open strings, and then the basic barre chords, and then you get into all the high end fancy stuff with extensions and weird tonalities. Or maybe just sort all the chords by root or tonic. I dunno. I really don't approach the guitar that seriously. If something has a lot of x3b4n93#13sus12 crapola in it, I turn to the next page and move right along. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
