I can understand how one could lose interest in Linux on the desktop.
It certainly can be rough around the edges for audio, although my
system has been working fine for a while now.

For me, if I got to the point of purchasing an OS X machine, why would
I wait and spend time waiting for Rosegarden to be ported to Cocoa
instead of purchasing some of the incredible software available?
Rosegarden would be making a late entry into a mature ecosystem that
has some of the best audio software out there.

Matt Henley



On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Guillaume Laurent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  On Apr 10, 2008, at 12:22 , Kevin Donnelly wrote:
>
>  > First, I want to say thanks for all the work you've done on RG in
>  > the past.
>  >
>  > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 14:58, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
>  >> As I've said, I've completely lost interest in Linux on the desktop.
>  >> I've come to realize that it's pretty much hopeless, so I'm now a
>  >> happy OS X user (since january).
>  >
>  > You obviously have good reasons for this decision, and it would be
>  > presumptuous of me to argue with those.  However, I find it ironic,
>  > because
>  > Linux on the desktop is actually almost there.
>
>  Chris said the same thing, and I think you're both mistaken. Your
>  arguments, "almost there", "beginning to work in <whatever domain>",
>  or "depends on the right distro" (so commonly used it's almost said as
>  a reflex), are the same I've always heard, and used myself, for almost
>  as long as I've been part of the Linux community. I'm pretty confident
>  you'll keep on using them for a long time.
>
>
>  > over there, and so on).  This DIY approach does not inherently seem
>  > to me to
>  > be deleterious, given how fast Linux has caught up on proprietary
>  > OSs, but I
>  > agree it can be confusing for new users.
>
>  The DIY approach is the reason why Linux won't ever reach outside of
>  geek-land. And it's an unfixable problem since it's a direct
>  consequence of its very nature. As for "catching up fast", that's also
>  an old argument, and yet Linux still has less than 1% of the desktop
>  market share. Looking at OS X, I don't see any catch up, quite the
>  contrary.
>
>
>
>  > One important thing about a Linux-based audio setup is the cost - it
>  > allows
>  > people to use their creativity without having to spend upfront
>  > first.  I
>  > think that's a very important benefit.
>
>
>  As jwz said, "linux is free if your time has no value".
>
>
>  --
>  Guillaume
>  http://telegraph-road.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
>  Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
>  Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>  
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
>  _______________________________________________
>  Rosegarden-devel mailing list
>  [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
>  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to