On Apr 11, 2008, at 17:00 , Chris Cannam wrote: > On 11/04/2008, Guillaume Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Apr 11, 2008, at 15:30 , Chris Cannam wrote: >>> I just wish you'd see sense and realise that the >>> answer to your problem has been right in front of your nose all >>> along. >> >> I can't make any sense of sticking to a platform which pretty much >> doesn't care about us, sorry. > > Are you just trying to wind me up now? Porting the existing > application via Qt4 is the sensible option that's blindingly obvious, > nothing to do with "sticking to" a particular platform. I have no > interest in trying to persuade you to stick to Linux. Of course, it > is the better platform -- in my opinion -- but it's all just a matter > of taste.
You offer two reasons to port to Qt4 : that it keeps RG running on Linux (which I don't think is worth the hassle), and that it's a safer choice (which is probably true, but I'd rather take the risk anyway because it should be much more rewarding). > Anyway, I'm off on holiday for the next week. Have a good week > everyone, and happy arguing! Ah well, I think we're pretty much done here. Enjoy your holidays. -- Guillaume http://telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
