On Friday 11 April 2008, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > I'm not dictating anything, I'm just saying "I'm going this way, feel > free to follow".
You're saying that while implying that you're going to take Rosegarden with you. > I was thinking of 'Rosegarden X' for an alternative name, given that > it will be on a completely separate platform, I don't think there will > be much confusion over it. I agree resoundingly with Chris. This should not be called Rosegarden anything. That is a very sticky point that can make the difference between an amicable parting and a feud. I agree with Chris on pretty well every point in his long rant, and in his other messages as well. I've also gotten some private feedback from shy users who don't want to get into a development discussion they barely understand. Everybody is on the same page, or at least in the same book, and people who had no idea this was coming seem to be totally flabbergasted by this development. People, incidentally, who don't even know who you are. Thanks for all the fish, and good luck with your new project. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
