On Apr 11, 2008, at 22:05 , Arnout Engelen wrote: > Personally, I'd like to wish you good luck and fun on this project, > and > hope we'll be able to share as much code as possible - even though we > went separate ways for the 'presentation layer' (loosely speaking).
Thank you. > As for a name, I agree that it might be confusing to call the new > project 'Rosegarden' also, because it's entirely imaginable that some > future version of the QT Rosegarden will also run on MacOS X. Once > that > time comes, I hope we can share even more code and effort there. Who > knows. We'll see in time. At this stage I'll be happy to simply get more than the simple player I have now. > I would like to consider this new project somewhat of a 'sister > project' > of Rosegarden itself, rather than another 'version'. As such it'd make > sense to use a different, but related name - such as 'Pagoda' just to > give a silly example. Why not... I was also thinking of Apple Orchard. -- Guillaume http://telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
