On Apr 11, 2008, at 14:35 , D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > at all, but you aren't sufficiently important to this project to > dictate > something like this unilaterally. No one of us is.
I'm not dictating anything, I'm just saying "I'm going this way, feel free to follow". > a new project. It might even be a successful project, but neither > of us > needs the eventual confusion that would be caused by two totally > different > Rosegardens that both run on OS-X. It's the Rosegarden 2 vs. > Rosegarden 4 > thing on steroids. I was thinking of 'Rosegarden X' for an alternative name, given that it will be on a completely separate platform, I don't think there will be much confusion over it. > It bothers me that you are so high on the smell of your own farts > that you > can't comprehend that moving Rosegarden to a platform that doesn't > even exist > in my universe is only an improvement to my job of supporting it > because I am > effectively out of any job at all after that move. Of course I'm not expecting you to support it, that was hypothetical. Even RG on OS X is hypothetical too, at the moment :-). What I meant was that if RG was running on OS X (supposing you were using OS X of course), then you'd have a much easier job than you have now. -- Guillaume http://telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
