On 11/04/2008, Guillaume Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I'd like to be able to seriously tell my musician friends that they > can take a look at this sequencer I work on. As it is now, I just > can't, and the situation *can't* improve, because nobody can get all > the kernel devs, distro makers, alsa, jackd, fluidsynth and KDE devs > in one place and tell them to actually work together.
So you want it to run on OS/X. So then, do the rational thing, and port it to OS/X by the most obvious and most sensible route! Forget the exclusionary grand plan, and join in with something we can all benefit from. You're basically saying to us: "Here are my plans for Rosegarden. You're not part of them." Well, thanks. There's always a degree of compromise in making a project like this work. I don't care if it runs on OS/X or not, but I'm prepared to compromise as far as I can so that you can have that if you really want to. You've known that all along. But I can't compromise as far as "using Cocoa", because that would be meaningless; it would be no compromise at all; it would leave me nowhere. If you're going to continue working on Rosegarden, you need to compromise as well. You need to accept the fact that Rosegarden runs on Linux and find a way to actually move forward from that. If you're not up to it, fine: register a new SourceForge project, think of a new name, and good luck. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
