On 05/11/2014 04:55 AM, Tim Munro wrote: > I'm thinking it would be wise to hold off applying any of these > changes to the main code, until there are more people out there with > Qt5 installed who can help evaluate this stuff.
Ok. > By far the ugliest large change involves preserving the remote-url > capability of the FileSource class. Because QHttp and QFtp have been > dropped from Qt5 with no direct replacements offered, I have cobbled > together HTTP and passive-FTP clients, using the low-level QTcpSocket > class directly. These seem to work, but I can't find anywhere in > Rosegarden where this functionality is ever actually called for. > It's probably one of those relics from the Kde3 version that didn't > survive the transition to Qt4. I saw that. I might take a close look at that and see if I can get it into the code, or verify your suspicion that no one uses it is correct. This would at least get a big chunk of it finished. Ted. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
