On 10/02/2010 14:40 EDT, William Herrin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: >> Joel M. Halpern, acting as document shepherd > > Joel, > > I realize my comments are probably out of order, but I offer that were > the group polled at this time, I think it likely you would find > uncharacteristically strong consensus in favor of the following two > questions: > > 1. Should section 17 of draft 14 be cut following the second sentence > ("the group did not reach rough consensus on a single best > approach.")?
IMHO absolutely not. There is some value in the discussion and rebuttal, but the major point of the draft is what comes after that sentence. I say publish it. Yes there is still contention but who's surprised? Now we take the discussion into the IETF where we try to do Real Engineering by applying the results to the Real Internet, and see how well they do. > 2. Should the word "recommendation" be removed from the document's > title, replaced with a more neutral appellation such as "report," > "analysis," or "results?" Maybe, but I don't think that matters much. If I had to pick one I would go with "analysis and recommendation". swb _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
