On 10/05/2010 01:05 EDT, Robert Raszuk wrote: > Ross, > >> **only** the chair's recommendation > > I don't think it it true. I as a regular RRG WG member for that matter > do agree with the given recommendation as produced by RRG chairs. > > If you think this should be "*only** the chair's recommendation" can you > provide a detailed explanation on how to deliver RRG or for that matter > any other IETF or IRTF WG recommendation in the future which would not > be "*only** the chair's recommendation" ?
If there's rough consensus. Clearly the RRG did not achieve even rough consensus. If it had you could call it a recommendation of the RG. (Since it's an RG not a WG it's okay not to achieve consensus.) _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
