Ross,
> **only** the chair's recommendation
I don't think it it true. I as a regular RRG WG member for that matter
do agree with the given recommendation as produced by RRG chairs.
If you think this should be "*only** the chair's recommendation" can you
provide a detailed explanation on how to deliver RRG or for that matter
any other IETF or IRTF WG recommendation in the future which would not
be "*only** the chair's recommendation" ?
Thx,
R.
Then prove it. Hold a consensus check on the recommendation's
inclusion and find out for certain. That's what consensus checks
are for.
Personally I appreciate having the RRG chair's recommendation in the
report, as long as it is clearly marked (as I believe it is) as
**only** the chair's recommendation, and not in any way the consensus
of the RRG nor of any other group. I believe that the readers of this
report are in general smart enough not to take the recommendation as
anything more than one thing to look at with an open, serious, but
critical mind.
Ross
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list
[email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
