The current debate on this thread shows how many people are frustrated by  
the way their opinions had been ignored - including myself: Once I 
accomplished  that Lixia became interested in my TARA-objectives. I wrote up a 
list 
of 11  objectives and thereafter I have never heard any response again:-( 
Among these  objectives:  
 
----------------------------  
2) Moore's Law:  
Next hop retrieval by 1 resp. 3 (indexed) table  lookups. 
Will increase the speed of the next hop retrieval by factor 20 i.e.  enable 
Moore's law applicability - even in cases where the best next hop is to  be 
replaced by some other (e.g. detouring) next hop: you can simply,  
temporarily, replace the indexed table entry with the alternate next hop  info. 
No caching needed (of course). 
----------------------------- 
Hereby I assumed that the internet consisted of approx. 10,000  DFZ-routers 
only and that a TARA-router should see the closestly zoomed map of  its own 
entire square-degree-geopatch. 
Now Robin told me that there are rather 210,000 DFZ-routers. Hence it  
would be appropriate to have an even closer zoom showing the own entire  
square-minute-geopatch. 
Thanks to Robin I could make a jump of joy:The improved solution is a  
modified TARA-Locator consisting of 3 components: (1) Square-degree#, (2)  
Square-minute#, (3) Square-second#. 
The next hop retrieval can be made by ONE SINGLE table lookup in ALL  CASES 
: 
Is destination's locator.square-degree# not equal to my  own? 
If YES, offset 64800-elements-sized table t1 by  dest.square-degree# 
else : Is destination's locator.square-minute# not equal to my  own? 
If YES, offset 3600-elements-sized table t2 by  dest.square-minute# 
else: Is destination's locator.square-second# not equal to my  own? 
If YES, offset 3600-elements-sized table t3 by  dest.square-second# 
else: I (the current router) am the endpoint of  TARA-forwarding. 
Is there anyone else who cares for enabling that Moore's law becomes  
applicable? 
If YES, share my joy :-) 
Heiner 
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to