... > That's beside the point. This is our document, our findings. If it > can't include our recommendations then it shouldn't include any. > > If Tony allows a consensus check, which he hasn't and today reiterated > that he won't, I suspect we'd find that most of the participants > agree.
I don't. The draft quite clearly states that there is no RG consensus and states what is the chairs' recommendation. This is all objectively true and I have no problem with it whatever. I wouldn't object to the document title being made more bland, and I think Tony has already agreed to that. Brian _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
