[Rswg] Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01.txt

Wed, 20 May 2026 02:12:53 -0700

I'm in favor of adoption of this draft.  I do *not* believe there is that much intended variation between the streams, and someone would really have to show me that this is the case. I have no problem with streams overriding certain provisions on a case-by-case basis. And to John's point, I don't recall where we actually took this on as work, either here or in the IETF, and failed. Mostly what Brian is doing is consolidating the RFC Editor and IETF statements.  I agree with nearly all of EKR's specific points, one of which aligns with what Colin wrote, but all of those points could be fixed. 

Eliot


On 20.05.2026 00:38, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

So, I haven't seen any comments.
Either that means everybody is 100% happy with the draft and we should adopt it immediately, or nobody is interested and we should just drop it. Which is it to be? 

Regards/Ngā mihi
   Brian

On 23-Apr-26 17:04, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

Heavily updated following many comments...
The main points were to make it clear that stream policies always win, and I added a minimal section on dispute resolution. 

More comments please!

     Brian

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01.txt
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:55:26 -0700
From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Internet-Draft draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01.txt is now available. 

     Title:   Ethical aspects of RFC authorship
     Author:  Brian E. Carpenter
     Name:    draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01.txt
     Pages:   11
     Dates:   2026-04-22

Abstract:

     This document describes guidelines for assigning authorship in RFC
     documents, including guidelines for disclosing the use of artificial 
     intelligence during document preparation.  It also discusses the
     related issues of acknowledgements, editors and contributors.  The
     various RFC streams may set their own guidelines, which will have
     priority.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01.html 

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01 

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to